Sugary beverage tax in San Francisco may be headed to November ballot despite missed deadline

FILE - This Wednesday, Oct. 1, 2014, file photo, shows soft drinks for sale at K & D Market in San Francisco. San Francisco officials are deciding whether to impose a warning on ads for soda pop. Supporters and opponents say San Francisco would be the first place in the country to require warnings on ads for soda, which is linked to rotting teeth and obesity. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu, File)

SAN FRANCISCO (BCN) — Supporters of a sugar-sweetened drink tax in San Francisco said Thursday that the proposed tax will be in front of voters in November, even though they missed the deadline to submit an initiative petition to qualify the measure for the ballot.

Yoyo Chan, an aide for Supervisor Malia Cohen, said a technical error prevented the campaign from submitting the 18,000 signatures supporters collected on time.

Cohen and other supporters of the measure held a news conference Thursday morning outside of City Hall to announce the collection and planned submission of the signatures.

But Department of Elections director John Arntz said the signatures never arrived to his department and needed to be submitted by Wednesday, the deadline of 180 days after supporters began circulating the petition.

However, the measure can still make it on the November ballot if the board clerk and sending a copy to the Department of Elections by June 21.

Besides Cohen, Supervisor Eric Mar and Supervisor Scott Wiener showed their support for the measure, which aims to curb the consumption of sugary drinks and improve the health of residents.

Chan, Cohen’s aide, said the measure has the support of a fourth supervisor but did not specify who that was.

Supervisor John Avalos supported a similar measure in 2014 when it was defeated at the polls. Proposition E in 2014 would have imposed a tax of 2 cents per ounce for sugary beverages but only was supported by 55 percent of voters, short of the two-thirds needed to pass.

“We are not giving up,” Cohen said.

Compared with 2014, the new measure, as it’s written, is a little different. The tax is 1 cent per ounce instead of 2 cents and the revenue earned will go into the city’s general fund.

In 2014, the money was earmarked for health, nutrition, physical education and active recreation programs.

The California Beverage Association, an industry advocate group for non-alcoholic beverages, issued a statement regarding the new proposed ballot measure.

“While posing as a means to improve public health, the fact remains that consumption of these beverages has declined while rates of obesity and diabetes have been on the rise. It’s misleading to single out any single food beverage or ingredient as a unique contributor to these complex health issues,” the statement said.

In November 2014, the city of Berkeley became the first city in the country to pass a similar measure.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s